<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Blog Gertude Ryan</title><description></description><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>102</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-4573602880819636794</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-10T04:46:55.362-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>patentes</category><title>WSJ: Tribunal Supremo pone límites a los derechos de explotación de patentes</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/06/wsj-tribunal-supremo-pone-lmites-los.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-8535599354440741013</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-06T06:08:08.779-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clarence Thomas</category><title>60 Minutes: La vida de Clarence Thomas 3/3</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/05/60-minutes-la-vida-de-clarence-thomas_6849.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-6808929548376399783</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-06T06:07:12.581-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clarence Thomas</category><title>60 Minutes: La vida de Clarence Thomas 2/3</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/05/60-minutes-la-vida-de-clarence-thomas_06.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-4988772757502478942</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-06T06:05:31.159-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clarence Thomas</category><title>60 Minutes: La vida de Clarence Thomas</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/05/60-minutes-la-vida-de-clarence-thomas.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-1902069466285031499</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-06T06:00:59.862-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>integración racial</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clarence Thomas</category><title>Clarence Thomas habla sobre raza y derecho</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/05/clarence-thomas-habla-sobre-raza-y.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-41696477752283967</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-29T06:48:08.047-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Supreme Court</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Scalia</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jueces</category><title>60 Minutes: Entrevista a Antonin Scalia</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/04/60-minutes-entrevista-antonin-scalia.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-7605418151315153802</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-25T03:15:47.381-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Medellin v. Texas</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Supreme Court</category><title>Conferencia sobre sentencia Medellin v. Texas</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/04/conferencia-sobre-sentencia-medellin-v.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-5874674148249998792</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-25T01:40:49.357-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Bush</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Supreme Court</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Scalia</category><title>60 Minutes: Magistrado Scalia evade preguntas sobre Gore v. Bush</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/04/60-minutes-magistrado-scalia-evade.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-8556108148488339513</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-14T11:23:13.892-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>torts</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>judges</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>corruption</category><title>Legendario abogado de los "Torts" en affair de corrupción</title><atom:summary type='text'>El abogado Richard Scruggs, conocido por ganar millonarios juicios a las compañías de tabaco y otras corporacociones, ha sido descubierto in fraganti en un penoso episodio de corrupción.</atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/03/legendario-abogado-de-los-torts-en.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-7360341579348937518</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-21T09:55:56.958-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>state law</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jurisprudencia</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Supreme Court</category><title>WSJ: Tres sentencias del Supremo invalidan diposiciones estatales</title><atom:summary type='text'>El Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos dictó sentencia en los procesos Riegel v. Medtronic Inc., Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transp. Assn. y Preston v. Ferrer. En todos estos casos invalidó disposiciones de leyes estatales.Pueden ver la entrevista en video realizada por The Wall Street JournalHigh Court Overrules 3 State Laws Justices Back CongressAs Dominant RegulatorOf Interstate Commerce By</atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/02/wsj-tres-sentencias-del-supremo.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-7707112922297250281</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-13T10:33:48.318-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Bush</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>escuchas telefónicas</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>garantías constitucionales</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>congreso</category><title>NYT: Bush urge aprobación de nueva ley de espionaje</title><atom:summary type='text'>Bush Presses House to Approve Bill on Surveillance By ERIC LICHTBLAUWASHINGTON — President Bush strongly urged the House of Representatives on Wednesday to quickly approve a surveillance bill passed by the Senate Tuesday evening, saying he would not agree to a further extension of the current eavesdropping law.The president effectively gave the House a deadline to act, since the current authority</atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/02/nyt-bush-urge-aprobacin-de-nueva-ley-de.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-5592415115851008733</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-04T06:31:41.829-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>McCain</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>conservadores</category><title>WSJ: Sobre elecciones y el futuro del Tribunal Supremo</title><atom:summary type='text'>McCain and the Supreme CourtBy STEVEN G. CALABRESI and JOHN O. MCGINNISFebruary 4, 2008; Page A14The conservative movement has made enormous gains over the past three decades in restoring constitutional government. The Roberts Supreme Court shows every sign of building on these gains.Yet the gulf between Democratic and Republican approaches to constitutional law and the role of the federal courts</atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/02/wsj-sobre-elecciones-y-el-futuro-del.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-6698680743557002036</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-23T12:16:13.687-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><title>NYT: Suplemento sobre magistrados del Tribunal Supremo</title><atom:summary type='text'>El New York Times ha creado una página muy didáctica con la biografía y principales decisiones de los miembros más reciente del Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos, Alito y Roberts.</atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/01/nyt-suplemento-sobre-magistrados-del.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-1813340573562892452</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-23T01:57:05.082-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>propiedad privada</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>función pública</category><title>NYT: Agentes de la ley son inmunes por pérdida o robo de bienes incautados</title><atom:summary type='text'>Justices Broaden Immunity for Officers By LINDA GREENHOUSEWASHINGTON — Federal law enforcement officers are immune from lawsuits for mishandling, losing or even stealing personal property that comes under their control in the course of their official duties, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday in a 5-to-4 decision.The case was brought by a federal prison inmate, but the ruling was not limited to </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/01/nyt-agentes-de-la-ley-son-inmuenes-por.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-6984421942379525743</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-09T10:19:11.414-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Mukasey</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Procurador general</category><title>WSJ: Mukasey testificará ante el Congreso</title><atom:summary type='text'>Mukasey Shows Independent StreakBig Test Awaits Attorney General When He Testifies Before Senate PanelBy EVAN PEREZJanuary 23, 2008; Page A4WASHINGTON -- Arriving at the Federal Bureau of Investigation's holiday party last month, Attorney General Michael Mukasey went directly to the registration table for surnames starting with M. Staff members gently advised him there was no need to register. He</atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/01/wsj-mukasey-testificar-ante-el-congreso.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Qvzh77iJUJY/R5cKzSp9EJI/AAAAAAAAADc/Sn3uNGHjMLs/s72-c/MUK.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-1804450086560868830</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-23T01:32:08.798-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>class action</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Enron</category><title>WSJ: Tribunal Supremo limita responsabilidad secundaria por fraude</title><atom:summary type='text'>Justices Rebuff Enron HoldersBy JESS BRAVIN and MARK H. ANDERSONJanuary 23, 2008; Page A2WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court turned away an appeal from Enron shareholders seeking to recover losses from Wall Street banks, underscoring the sweep of last week's decision limiting the liability of companies that help other corporations commit fraud.The decision effectively ends the $40 billion Enron </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2008/01/wsj-tribunal-supremo-limita.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-8302372207500726691</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-04T08:19:14.305-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hipotecas</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Subprime</category><title>WSJ: Avalancha de juicios hipotecarios</title><atom:summary type='text'>Judges Tackle 'Foreclosure Mills'High-Volume FirmsThat Cut CornersAre Rebuked, FinedBy AMIR EFRATINovember 30, 2007; Page B6Law firms handling thousands of foreclosure cases on behalf of mortgage lenders and servicers are drawing criticism from judges, who say roughshod filing practices are trampling borrowers' rights.Lawyers operating so-called foreclosure mills often are paid based on the </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/12/wsj-avalancha-de-juicios-hipotecarios.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-3221975096051586000</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-28T07:30:01.202-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>pensiones</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>constitución</category><title>WSJ: Demanda por perdidas en fondo de pensiones</title><atom:summary type='text'>High Court Hears 401(k) CaseBy MARK H. ANDERSONNovember 27, 2007; Page A6WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court justices hearing a case of alleged retirement fund mismanagement seemed uncomfortable with barring employees from suing over certain losses to an individual's retirement account.The high court considered arguments in a case brought by a South Carolina man who alleged his employer, DeWolff, Boberg </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/11/wsj-demanda-por-perdidas-en-fondo-de.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-2070856508600192737</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-28T07:26:26.652-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Irak</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>oil for food</category><title>WSJ: Magnate sentenciado por caso irregularidades en el caso "oil for food" de Irak</title><atom:summary type='text'>Tycoon Sent to JailIn Oil-for-Food CaseBy CHAD BRAYNovember 29, 2007; Page B10Texas oil trader Oscar S. Wyatt Jr. was sentenced to more than a year in prison after pleading guilty to a conspiracy charge and admitting he approved the payment of a $200,000 surcharge to the Iraqi government in violation of the United Nations' oil-for-food program.At a hearing in Manhattan, U.S. District Judge Denny </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/11/wsj-magnate-sentenciado-por-caso.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-915936326669401204</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-28T07:23:23.051-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>class action</category><title>WSJ Law Blog: Sentencia en caso de "securities class action"</title><atom:summary type='text'>Jury Rules For JDSU In Rare Securities Class Action TrialPosted by Peter Lattman As we told you last month, a securities-fraud class-action lawsuit that goes to trial is as rare as a pygmy marmoset. There have been 19 securities class action trials since 1996. One that goes to a jury verdict are even rarer — as rare as, say, a Cambodian Forest Ox (pictured). Only four securities class-action </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/11/wsj-law-blog-sentencia-en-caso-de.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-7816528908284058211</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-27T01:29:54.051-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ERIDS</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><title>SCOTUSblog: Audiencia del caso ERISA ante el Supremo</title><atom:summary type='text'>Argument Recap: LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg &amp; Assoc. (by Workplace Prof Blog) Posted: 26 Nov 2007 04:50 PM CSTNote: The following argument recap is by Paul Secunda of the University of Mississippi School of Law and Workplace Prof Blog, where this entry is cross-posted.  The SCOTUSwiki page for this case, with more links and documents, is here.As Rick pointed out this past weekend, the </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/11/scotusblog-audiencia-del-caso-erisa.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-6232988157843775867</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-26T03:21:37.425-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>inmigración</category><title>Findlaw News: Proyecto de ley para criminalizar empleo de ilegales</title><atom:summary type='text'>US government revising plan for penalizing businesses that hire illegal immigrants(AP) - WASHINGTON-The government says it will rewrite rules for penalizing employers of illegal immigrants to try to satisfy a federal judge in San Francisco who put the crackdown on hold.U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer stopped the Bush administration last month from going ahead with enforcement of regulations </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/11/findlaw-news-proyecto-de-ley-para.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-4492855157958214274</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-26T03:16:32.703-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><title>SCOTUSblog: Agenda semanal del Tribunal Supremo</title><atom:summary type='text'>The Week AheadSunday, November 25th, 2007 6:25 pm Ben Winograd Comments (0) Print This PostEmail this • Share on Facebook • Digg This!On Monday, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Larue v. DeWolff (06-856), asking whether ERISA provides private causes of action for plan participants alleging fiduciary breaches. In advance of the argument, the Court is expected to release remaining orders </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/11/scotblog-agenda-semanal-del-tribunal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-7958505756878665497</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-24T09:50:58.174-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>constitución</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>armas</category><title>The Wall Street Journal: Sobre armas y derecho constitucional</title><atom:summary type='text'>Guns and the Constitution November 24, 2007; Page A10In recent decades, the Supreme Court has discovered any number of new rights not in the explicit text of the Constitution. Now it has the opportunity to validate a right that resides in plain sight -- "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" in the Second Amendment.This week, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case of District of </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/11/wall-street-journal-sobre-armas-y.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514713168900983250.post-4146084603398423745</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-22T07:47:09.392-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Tribunal Supremo</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>constitución</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>armas</category><title>TNR: Reseña del libro "Out of Range", de Tushnet</title><atom:summary type='text'>The Most Mysterious RightCass R. Sunstein,  The New Republic  Published: Monday, November 12, 2007Out of RangeBy Mark V. Tushnet(Oxford University Press, 156 pp., $19.95)In 1991, Warren E. Burger, the conservative chief justice of the Supreme Court, was interviewed on the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour about the meaning of the Second Amendment's "right to keep and bear arms." Burger answered that the </atom:summary><link>http://grlo.blogspot.com/2007/11/tnr-resea-del-libro-out-of-range-de.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Gertrude Ryan)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item></channel></rss>